Anyone checking out the home page of Post-Dispatch's website on Saturday morning [March 24] might have noticed something odd -- a total lack of any reference to what was easily the biggest story of the morning, the previous day's vote in the U.S. House of Representatives to impose a timetable for pulling American troops out of Iraq.
Sure, the site's lead story (as of 8 a.m.) did have to do with military matters, but it was a feel-good piece titled "Jefferson College Donates Computers to Soldiers," replete with a photo of a crew-cutted serviceman in cammies lugging PC gear from the trunk of a parked car.
The historic House vote didn't even make the Post-Dispatch site's "top headlines" list on the right-hand side of the home page. "U-M Rolla proposes name change" qualified for this lofty placement, as did "Ex-treatment center worker is accused of sex with boy" and six other stories.
However, not one of these "top headlines" happened to be the one that mattered most to the nation and the people of St. Louis, many of whom happen to have loved ones stationed in the Persian Gulf. There was no indication that a house of Congress had undertaken what the Washington Post (in its website's lead story that same morning) called "one of the toughest antiwar measures ever to pass a house of Congress during combat operations."
Regardless of one's stance on the war, there is something bizarre about such blithe ignorance on the part of our sole daily newspaper. It has been clear for quite some time that Joseph Pulitzer's journal, once among the finest daily publications in the United States, has chosen a long sleep, abdicating its role as the paper of record for the metropolitan area.
This morning's website shows, once again, that the among the greatest public services any St. Louisans could provide their community would be the purchase and overhaul of the Post-Dispatch -- or the establishment of a competing multimedia daily that actually wakes up with its eyes open to the world around it.
Mark Ribbing
I've been noticing the same thing. This week, while huge news stories were breaking, including state takeover of city public schools, USAgate and, of course, the historic house vote, the PD's web-site had Tony LaRussa's photo up for two days. The paper is a joke.
Posted by Mary Eileen on Sat., Mar 24, 2007 at 1:49 PMOk, Donnybrook is not 'Firing Line', but the goings on in Jeff City and the schools garnered about two minutes of discussion versus about seven on Tony LaRussa.
Posted by butler miller on Mon., Mar 26, 2007 at 10:26 AMThis is nothing new. On election night in November, I was blogging about the Missouri results for a national blog and I embarassed for the Post-Dispatch. Their website was one of the first places I went for information, but there were no updates to the election news or to the political blog for most of the evening. The coverage on other smaller papers' sites from across the state was impeccable; they had people out in the field, making phone calls, describing the situation at the polls, and more. And when you stop to think about the resources (read: $$$) of the Post-Dispatch in comparison to all of these smaller operations, the results are simply inexcusable. And it's not just the website: more and more families I know are cancelling their subscriptions to the paper itself, too. Something needs to change.
Posted by Katie on Tue., Mar 27, 2007 at 7:29 AMRight a Wrong. Submit any tips or story ideas by using our anonymous email form. Confidentiality is guaranteed.