In the brightly lit Carpenter's Union Hall just south of Forest Park on Hampton, Shrewsbury supporters nibbled on wings, meatballs and chicken-salad sandwiches as they awaited the results everyone expected to hear.
The earliest results, with only a quarter of the votes or so, had Shrewsbury up by 10%. Election watchers, an alderman or two and others hovered around a staffer who pulled up the returns as they were updated on the Board of Elections' website. Some were attempting to extrapolate the early returns by guessing which wards were being counted and how long it would take others to come in.
With an expectation of a slow night at the Shrewsbury party, others, including some journalists, were already slipping out to swing by some of the other election night parties. The hot tickets of the night were expected to be Kacie Starr Triplett's gathering and that of Shrewsbury's challenger, Lewis Reed. Both ran energetic campaigns staffed by young operatives and, though not picked by many as the favorites to win (even among the campaigns, some bets were hedged), were figured to be as much fun in defeat as in victory.
Shrewsbury's Aldermanic supporters, friends, and campaign staffers mingled and ate as the returns came in. The mellow but confident vibe in the room began to wane not long after the early returns seemed to confirm nearly everyone's expectations.
The buffet stopped being replenished right about the time things became tense. Reed picked up a 5% lead just after nine and, though it slimmed to 2% at one point, he never lost his lead.
The subdued affair resembled the campaign: straightforward, modest, and friendly. It may be unfair to classify a campaign on its final night, but in a race with rival campaign that drew as much upon its energy as its ideas, it left one lacking. It's that intangible substance that turns a campaign into a mission, and a gathering into a party. It may be dismissed as buzz, flash or even unsubstantial, but its effect is real.
Shrewsbury's style is methodical and tenacious. He crisscrossed the city attending public gatherings, large and small. Debates, forums, openings and campaign fundraisers; Shrewsbury was there for them all. His answers to constituents questions were grounded in that detailed concern that defined him. His rejection of a city vehicle might seem like folksy affectation in some but seemed to strike true in Shrewsbury.
As word of the final results came in the concern-tinged smiles fell. Though it was a major upset for the incumbent Shrewsbury and his nearly half million-dollar war-chest, the crowd took it quietly.
The silence was broken, however, by a wave of applause that ushered Shrewsbury into the room and up to the stage just before ten o'clock.
Though he seemed moved by the standing ovation, Shrewsbury managed a bit of self-deprecating humor.
Don't worry, he told his supporters, "I've done this three times," he said.
Shrewsbury thanked his staff, supporters, friends and family for their support over the 24 years in which he has worked in elected politics.
"I'm disappointed but not crushed," said Shrewsbury, who said it may be time for a break, but that he was not getting out of politics.
He wrapped up his concession with a saying that he must have heard when he signed up to work on former-Congressman Dick Gephardt's campaign at the ripened age of 15.
"There is nothing more honorable than getting involved in politics," said Shrewsbury.
Afterwards Shrewsbury, said one of his most important achievements, looking back as President of the Board of Alderman, was helping get the board back on solid financial ground. He also said he still plans on making an appointment to the proposed transitional board that will oversee the St. Louis Public Schools following the state's decision in February to intervene in the district–the Mayor Francis Slay and Governor Matt Blunt will also appoint a member.
Despite his promise to stay in politics, afterward Shrewsbury said he has had a good 24 years and that perhaps there are other options he should examine.
Former State Senator Pat Dougherty has been a long-time supporter and was saddened to see his friend of almost 30 years lose. The two became friends through a service organization they both volunteered for.
"I am disappointed," said Dougherty. "I thought he was doing the right thing for the city."
Great description of the events. Good way to explain that Shrewsbury went to each event and don't expect Reed to show up at many. Jim is a down to earth guy I have known for 37 years. One of his faults was that he did not go negative. It might have aroused the base to show up. It would have shown the many problems with Reed and let the his base of support know that it WAS a close election and to be sure to vote for him.
There are alot of negative aspects about the new President that the residents of the City will find out about soon enough. Jim could have brought out many of those if he had chosen to go negative but, sadly, that is not in his nature.
He tried to explain many things about his record and it seemed to always come out in his style that many perceived as wrong but not really. He moved his law practice out to the County MANY years ago so he would not have to worry about conflicts of interest. The opposition played on that in what Jim told me was a HATE SHREWSBURY campaign that many of the Alderman felt toward him.
He is honest and wouldn't let them manipulate the system to their advantage and many DID hate him for that. Look for that to change in a month. Because he didn't let them have their way they HATED SHREWSBURY. Even so, he was always there to help when they needed HIM for such things as raising money or just needing him to be at an event.
SAD...
Posted by BNB on Fri., Mar 9, 2007 at 6:14 PMJim Shrewsbury is a good man.
Posted by Eddie Roth on Fri., Mar 9, 2007 at 7:50 PMOh yeah, you forgot the great pasta con broccolli & roast beef in aujus sauce on the buffet. Fat guys like me want everyone who was at Reed's know what they missed! Victory isn't everything.
Posted by BNB on Fri., Mar 9, 2007 at 9:22 PMBNB, your comment about Shrewsbury not going negative is touching but not consistent with the facts. We are city residents and we had two of the most hate-filled phone calls to our house about Lewis Reed that I've ever heard.
Everybody who worked on the Shrewsbury campaign and his close supporters may not have known about these calls but they were real--I had one. My 77 year old mother had one too and was so upset that she hung up on the caller.
I say we give Lewis Reed a chance. He'll make his own reputation now.
Posted by Mary Eileen on Sat., Mar 10, 2007 at 9:34 AMBNB, I am looking at a mail piece put out by Shrewsbury that says "Lewis Reed will take us Backwards" that sounds a little negative, and if you read the rest of it you will know it is negative. Jim may be a nice guy, and he may have gotten the wrong end of the stick but he is no angel and definitely not clean in this mess. You may not like Lewis Reed but the election is over Jim lost, move on, there are 4 years to figure out how to beat Lewis.
Posted by Worried Citizen on Sun., Mar 11, 2007 at 12:02 PMMr. Obama has been called the first "post racial" presidential candidate. I think the same can be said for Lewis Reed who ran a positive uplifting campaign. And congratualtions to Vince Curran who is becoming the go to guy in political organization in the eastern part fo the state.
Posted by Norm Pressman on Sun., Mar 11, 2007 at 3:21 PMWorried Citizen never saw anything Slay has either orchestrated or had a hand in that he/she didn't like. Stay on this blog long enough and you will see Worried Citizen as a voice for City Hall.
The Shadow knows!
Reed also had negative advertising- I received a mailer attacking Shrewsbury, and to know it was from Reed you had to read an optical illusion small white print on a yellow background. So it goes.
Posted by rcsala on Sun., Mar 11, 2007 at 7:30 PMI didn't say that I liked Lewis, I didn't even defend Lewis, I just pointed out that Jim Shrewsbury didn't run the righteous campaign that BNB claims. Lewis Reed and Jim Shrewsbury both went negative.
The voters voted now we move on. Propoganda is for before an election. Once it is over there is nothing anyone can do, unless it is School Board stuff.
BNB now has 4 years to try and mount a campaign against Lewis Reed, just as people had 4 years to mount a campaign against Jim Shrewsbury.
As for the "Shadow" I am a voice for myself, if it appears as if I am a voice for anyone else, that is purely coincidence.
Posted by Worried Citizen on Sun., Mar 11, 2007 at 9:59 PMRight a Wrong. Submit any tips or story ideas by using our anonymous email form. Confidentiality is guaranteed.