Shrewsbury Quarter
Is in and scanned.
$84,650 raised; $42,155 spent; $238,825 on-hand.
Page 20, specifically donation number 66, is from Eagle Realty one of the Blairmont players. Maybe this is why Shrewsbury touts his hard line anti-building code violation position, yet isn't sending any fines to those responsible for wide scale violation that is Blairmont?
Posted by Douglas Duckworth on Tue., Jan 30, 2007 at 2:44 PMCheck out the latest ACC print edition for a fascinating article by Dave D. where he shadows Lewis Reed on the campaign trail.
Posted by acc reader on Tue., Jan 30, 2007 at 3:48 PM
Where is Reed's report?
How can you ask for someone's vote when you flagrantly ignor the laws?
Posted by watchdog on Tue., Jan 30, 2007 at 7:17 PMWasn't this report due like 5 days ago? Has Reed's been sent in but just not scanned? What gives?
Posted by Confused Citizen on Tue., Jan 30, 2007 at 10:41 PMlike i said over at pubdef ... talk about filing late, looking at the date stamp on the papers shrewsbury filed he was late filing by 5 days.
Posted by confused francis park mom on Wed., Jan 31, 2007 at 8:26 AMIf you made the post on Pub Def, I am sure you read the post explaining that the reports have to be postmarked by a certain date and that the date stamp on the report is the date when it was received by the Ethics Commission. Maybe you wouldn't be so "confused" if you did some research!
Posted by Re: Francis Park Mom on Wed., Jan 31, 2007 at 9:02 AMOk. So maybe Reed's is delayed for the same reason then.
Posted by Confused Citizen on Wed., Jan 31, 2007 at 9:59 AMACC print edition...wow it's been ahwile!
Posted by Reader on Wed., Jan 31, 2007 at 10:08 AMIt looks like Reed has published his books, and did it online rather than the old format of using a typewriter. I haven't had time to go through all the line items, but from the summary page it looks like he raised more than twice the amount of Shrewsbury. Congrats to Reed on the grand job of fundraising and on moving into the digital age, even if publishing one day after his opponent.
Posted by retired accountant on Wed., Jan 31, 2007 at 3:22 PMPubdef is reporting that Reed has $92,000 after spending $113,000.
What the heck did he spend 113-grand on??!!
Besides a few illegally placed yard signs, I haven't seen his name anywhere!
Posted by political watcher on Wed., Jan 31, 2007 at 8:50 PMWow.
If this is even half true, Reed's in big trouble.
I agree with Political watcher other than illegally placed yard signs.. no ads ..and the pitful lie filled literature ... the personal debt... what a campaigner Reed and Co are..Looks unprofessional to me Looks like Jim Shrewbury will be back on Tue.Sorry big spender looks like its a practice run Reed...St.louis expects better than Reed and sad company.....
Posted by Politically speaking on Thu., Mar 1, 2007 at 7:38 PMHey retired accountant Reed borrowed $88,000 for his campaign that has to be debt paid off what's professional about going in debt to look good for the record????Seems to me EVEN REED'S DEVELOPER FRIENDS AIN'T TRUSTING HIS GAME?????????
Posted by $$$on hand on Thu., Mar 1, 2007 at 7:41 PM
Right a Wrong. Submit any tips or story ideas by using our anonymous email form. Confidentiality is guaranteed.