From email tipster:
I just completed a phone survey on the aldermanic board president race. EMH Opinion Sampling was the polling firm. Based in Sacramento CA.
Asked opinions of Firefighters Local #73, Reed, Shrewsbury, Bosley Jr. and McMillan.
Pro Reed statements included over $1 billion in development, establishing integrated IT system for city, starting Bike St. Louis. Cons were his connections to developers and support of TIFs, and never having held citywide office. Also a really odd con statement that his phone number is listed under his wife's name.
Pro Shrewsbury statements included starting meetings on time, outlawing firearms on city property, and making it illegal to leave children alone in cars. Con statements were having an office in the county, working only part time as president of the board, and allowing an alderman to urinate in chambers.
I think the survey was for Reed because of a couple of statements indicating Shrewsbury did/didn't do something for (unnamed) political reasons, e.g. support budget increases for firemen. No references were made to Reed's political motivations.
I'd be curious to know where Mr.Reed stands on north side development, which is desperately needed. Anothe question I have is when will someone speak publicly about the african american brain drain in this town. Our young and talented african american residents leave town for college and never come back. Many of them end up relocating in Atlanta, Chicago, New York and elsewhere.
Posted by SouthCountyProgressive on Thu., Jan 18, 2007 at 1:54 PM"Our young and talented african american residents leave town for college and never come back. Many of them end up relocating in Atlanta, Chicago, New York and elsewhere."
Sadly, so do many of our young residents of all races.
Posted by Urban Review on Fri., Jan 19, 2007 at 1:16 PMRight a Wrong. Submit any tips or story ideas by using our anonymous email form. Confidentiality is guaranteed.