Arch City Chronicle

people. politics. st. louis.

"The Cars That Go Boom"

Though Tigre and Bunny of the 90's hip-hop group Le Tigre sing their praise, some aldermen in St. Louis have no love for the roving subwoofers-on-wheels.

The trunk-rattling sounds of souped-up stereo systems may be thing of the past if the Board of Aldermen have anything to say about it.

The Board passed BB 81 today that not only prohibits the use of eardrum-blowing car systems, but also their installation. If an officer stops a vehicle equipped with speakers over 12" or supercharged amplifiers, the owner may have his car impounded for four days and be slapped with a hefty fine; no less than $250.

Installers of such equipment may also be subject to fines if they are located in the city.

The bill sparked a vigorous debate with Aldermen Bosley Sr. (3rd), Carter (27th), and Schmid (20th) in favor of the bill, and Aldermen Troupe (1st), Gregali (14th) and Conway (8th) opposed.

The opposing aldermen agreed that cracking down on excessive noise is a positive step. However, going so far as to impound someone's vehicle merely for the existence of high-power equipment was too far. Conway called it a, "job of poor legislation."

Ald. Troupe equated the measure with prohibiting the possession of cars that can exceed the speed limit.

Ald. Conway joked that they may have found a new way to fund the budget, seize all the cars at the Rams' tailgate party.

Ald. Bosley argued that retirees, children, those "trying to convalesce" and regular people should not be subject to "scurrilous" music that can be heard a block away. "They are not listening to Mozart," said Bosely. He dismissed concerns about impounding vehicles saying the violators did not deserve their vehicles because of their disrespectful treatment of the community. "We hope [they] don't have the money to get the car back," said Bosley.

Ald. Florida (15th) asked to be added as a co-sponsor and said the bill, "seems excessive but is necessary. It's time to try a different tool."

The discussion appeared to generate some friction between Alderman Schmid and Aldermen Grigali and Troupe. The two aldermen seemed to think Schmid was unwilling to take their concerns seriously. Schmid said there had been plenty of time for concerns to be raised in committee.

Gregali worried that those who were pulled over for reasons unrelated to violations of existing noise ordinances may be subject to having their vehicles seized. Seeming to miss his point, Schmid contended that if they aren't making noise, they don't have to worry. Yet the bill states that the existence of the equipment, not just its operation, is cause enough to impound the vehicle, regardless of the reason for the stop.

The opposing alderman would have gone along with the bill provided the section on seizure was removed but the board voted down the amendment.

The board passed the bill 22-4.

Update: In a funny coincidence, Bosley was quoted in the Post Friday saying he found hip-hop an interesting genre that bridged the gap between the races. Said Bosley, "...this music is a great neutralizer". He did complain that the music was often violent.

In other news, one of the features at the Contemporary Art museum's Audiophile Series is Moses, a Chevy SUV covered in speakers.

Posted by Matthew on Fri., Jan 27, 2006 at 2:01 PM | News Stew (487)
Comments

If city cops don't have time to handle traffic violations (arguably life threatening), what makes people think they're going to take the time pull someone over for noise, a disturbing but not dangerous situation. It's likely this ordinance won't be used to enforce noise violations, but will be used to ratchet up fines on somebody already pulled over that rubs a cop the wrong way.

We should also put up signs telling custom car hobbiest(young adults staying out of trouble) to stay away from St. Louis, you're not welcomed.

Too bad this bill won't be in effect this weekend, we could impound a third of the cars at the car show.

Posted by Chris on Fri., Jan 27, 2006 at 5:15 PM

Awww, shucks. Does this mean I can't listen to my "Le nozze di Figaro" while cruising down South Grand anymore?

Posted by Larsdatter on Fri., Jan 27, 2006 at 5:16 PM

A new companion crime for DWB (Driving While Black):
LMWB: Listening to Music While Black

Posted by St Louis Oracle on Fri., Jan 27, 2006 at 5:54 PM

They ought to crack down on affluent whites who drive without the benefits of a front license plate. It always sticks in my craw when they have the OEM cover installed. "Go ahead, pull me over I'll get out of it."

One thing that I would hate to see happen is unqualified kids installing their own systems. I have seen some real bonehead installations.

For some reason, the loud bass does not bother me. But, I can certainly respect someone who is rattled out of bed on a regular basis, wanting to put a stop to it.

If you really think about it, the systems are designed to be louder outside of the car than inside. So, your right to swing your subwoofer ends at the tip of my eardrum. Right or wrong, used or abused, it all boils down to common courtesy.

Maybe instead of impounding the vehicles, they could have a drive through courtroom. The judge sticks his head out the window to see if the bazooka tube has been removed.

See, this governance thing is simple if you just think it through.

Posted by Tim R on Fri., Jan 27, 2006 at 8:42 PM

This may be the most rediculous law ever to be passed. Impounding vehicles and racking up outrageous fines because a car possesses a big stereo?? What about us law abiding citizens that possess these stereos, but arent morons about them and use them sensibly?? Are police officers going to waltz around local car shows in St. Louis now and take their ticket books and start scribbling off citations and then impound the 90% of the cars at the shows that possess such equipment?? Good call St. Louis!! In the words of Ron Burgandy.."Go F*** Yourself St. Louis!!"

Posted by Swerve on Wed., Feb 1, 2006 at 8:28 AM

I sent a letter to the mayor and hope everyone else did too. If you did we were heard cause he rejected the bill as is and sent it back for clarification. here is what I got from the Mayor's office.

Mayor Slay passed your concern on to me. The Mayor would like to thank you for your interest in the legislative process. As of Friday, Board Bill 81 and 82 have been sent back to committee at the request of the sponsor for more input. The Mayor will continue to monitor the bills as they proceed through the legislative process. Again we would like to thank you for your input and interest in the City of St. Louis.

Posted by wag314 on Tue., Feb 7, 2006 at 5:03 PM

http://freeblognetwork.com/mortgagelifeinsurance/ Mortgage life insurance Mortgage life insurance leads Mortgage protection life insurance leads Insurance life mortgage online quote Online mortgage life insurance company

Posted by Mortgage life insurance on Fri., Sep 29, 2006 at 8:35 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?