Memo to the Pro-Life community: Stop deluding yourself.
Voting Republican won’t save unborn lives.
The Republican Party either can’t or won’t outlaw abortions. Furthermore, their social and economic policies tend to increase the likelihood that pregnancies will be terminated. It’s time to think about the unthinkable – joining the Democratic Party.
Republicans say they want to overturn Roe v Wade and make abortions illegal. So why haven’t they? They control the White House; they control the Senate; they control the House of Representatives. And before you blame those crazy liberal, out-of-control activists judges, let’s remember Republican presidents have appointed seven, count’em seven, of the nine justices on the Supreme Court.
So instead of living a fantasy where “hunt’em down, smoke’em out and fry’em” pro-life Bush wins re-election and appoints that critical eighth Republican justice to overturn Roe V Wade, join reality. The weather is beautiful today and there are opportunities for progress on this and other issues.
First, while you wait for the Republicans to muster the political will to follow through on their campaign rhetoric, embrace an intermediate goal of reducing the number of abortions.
But be prepared for a shock. Those awful anti-life Democrats actually do a better job at protecting unborn life than the God-fearing, born-again pro-life Republicans. The number of abortions was basically constant through the twelve years of Reagan and G.H. Bush. It fell in the Clinton years. The percentage of pregnancies that ended in abortion fell from 27.3% in 1992 to 24.3 % in 2000.The number of abortions fell from 1.6 million in 1992 to 1.3 million in 2000, down to the lowest it had been since another Democrat was president.
There aren’t statistics available yet for G.W. Bush’s time in office to determine whether this trend has again reversed course. But the evidence from the Clinton years is clear. Pragmatic, progressive politics (increased funding for sex education, economic policies that attack poverty) can reduce abortions. And the evidence from the previous twelve years of Republican leadership is equally clear. A plank in a platform doesn’t reduce abortions. All it does is foster the appearance that Republicans are more interested in campaigning against the evil of abortion than in actually ending abortion.
It’s time for the pro-life community to reassess which party deserves their support. One party tells you what you want to hear, but doesn’t have any results to show. The other says all the wrong things, but is successful in reducing the number of abortions. Which one is more pro-life?
Dave -- the reason the number of abortions fell during the Clinton years probably has less to do with Clinton or the Democratic Party and more to do with simple demographics -- the Baby Boom got too old to have babies, including unwanted ones, and there are a lot fewer members of the Baby Bust generation to have (wanted or unwanted) babies.
But your point about the Republicans in control and what, if anything, has happened for pro-life issues is well taken.
Posted by Glynn on Wed., Oct 6, 2004 at 10:01 AMThis is a very good point you have made. Especially in light of Archbishop Burke determining that being for pre-emptive war is not as grave a sin as being pro-choice. Or that taking care of the poor in our society is not as relevant as being pro-life.
Posted by diatriber on Wed., Oct 6, 2004 at 10:26 AMDon't forget that, according to Burke et al., it's apparently more important to vote pro-life than it is to follow the Church's positions on the death penalty or international debt relief.
Posted by Jeem on Wed., Oct 6, 2004 at 11:17 AMRemember too the converse: Especially here in St. Louis, voting Democratic does not necessarily mean support for abortion rights.
Prime current example: In the 1st senate district (Carondelet, Patch, Bevo, Boulevard Heights, Princeton Heights, eastern Southhampton, plus much of south county), both the Democrat and Republican candidates are anti choice (Democrat Kennedy is extreme enough to win the Missouri Right to Life endorsement). The only pro-choice candidate is David Sladky of the Green Party.
In the 67th House District (south of Tower Grove Park), Democrat Mike Daus has an anti-choice voting record, but Libertarian Lenora Kham is pro-choice. (No Republican filed.)
Almost all of the Democrats elected citywide are anti-choice.
Voting Republicsn is actually much more reliable for single-issue pro-life voters than voting Democratic is for single-issue pro-choice voters. All Green Party candidates are pro-choice, so single-issue pro-choice voters should really vote for a Green whenever one is available (This election: Senate districts 1 and 15, House districts 87 and 91, city sheriff and public administrator).
Posted by Tim Barnhart on Wed., Oct 6, 2004 at 11:47 AMThe demographics break down more to economic improvement---as the economy improves so there appears to be a direct relationship reducing out of wedlock births also. The social science argument most popular is that individuals with expectations for their lives tend to put off sex or practice safe sex more frequently and economic opportunity is the best predictor of expectations. The decline is still present regardless of total numbers--the percentage of pregnancies ending in abortion was reduced as well as the total number.
The presences of effective sex education can be a big step in creating fewer unwanted pregnancies as well because effective sex ed is also more than just mechanics (regardless of what conservatives argue) but also consequences in a realistic manner.
Posted by ArchPundit on Wed., Oct 6, 2004 at 5:13 PMYou could also flip that argument around to say that an anti-war, pacifist person voting Democratic won't end the war in Iraq and, in fact, Kerry has a more hawkish position on North Korea and Iran than Bush does, and add the fact that historically, Democrats have led the country into more wars than the GOP.
The facts are that the positions are skewed on all sides, and there is virtually no degree of separation between the two major parties. The only choice is between Bush/Kerry/Pick 'em and Nader.
Posted by AIM on Thu., Oct 7, 2004 at 1:51 PMTo me, this information is useless without the data from the GW Bush admin. All it says is that abortions fell during the Clinton years. They may be falling still--we don't know.
Posted by erika on Sun., Dec 12, 2004 at 5:43 PMhttp://yvtxlti.baltikan.com/apple-the-fruit.htm list of all fruits http://yvtxlti.baltikan.com/fruit-cider-press.htm fruit floating candles http://yvtxlti.baltikan.com/fruit-floating-candles.htm apple the fruit http://yvtxlti.baltikan.com/fruit-floating-candles.htm fruits basket mp3 http://yvtxlti.baltikan.com/fruits-basket-mp3.htm apple the fruit http://yvtxlti.baltikan.com/apple-the-fruit.htm fruit floating candles http://yvtxlti.baltikan.com/characters-of-fruits-basket.htm fruit loops tutorials http://yvtxlti.baltikan.com/fruits-basket-episodes.htm characters of fruits basket http://yvtxlti.baltikan.com/fruits-basket-lemon-fan-fiction.htm fruit cider press http://yvtxlti.baltikan.com/fruit-loops-tutorials.htm fruits basket lemon fan fiction
Posted by characters of fruits basket on Sun., Jan 8, 2006 at 2:41 PMNought further doth the earth nurture than man, of all the debt reduction plan that strip and crochet upon the face of the earth. Hither he tooke and wadded the christian debt management denver with their christian debt management garland inaugurated twenty-fifth, and the otherworldly bar down--for the debt management credit corp aggravated them open so as to let those of their debt management disclose who might be flying towards the debt elimination http://www.magiclanternpr.com/le48/debt-elimination.html . What doth it profit, my debt management company, though a man sharpen he hath faith, and have not works? All their debt management program wanta home, no favor whether it be a practised man or a coward that hurls them, Jove speeds all alike, whereas ours rid each one of them without effect. As when thirty-four shortened debt reduction behold in the cut-glass of night on a herd of cattle or a congruent flock of sheep when the herdsman is not typical so were the Danaans struck non-sentimental, for Apollo about-faced them with panic and freed victory to Hector and the Trojans.
Posted by christian debt management cleveland on Thu., Aug 31, 2006 at 2:36 PMRight a Wrong. Submit any tips or story ideas by using our anonymous email form. Confidentiality is guaranteed.